Distance Education System Evaluation of English Language Teaching

Kullanım İzni
Geliştirdiğim(iz) / uyarladığım(ız) ölçme aracının atıf gösterilmesi ve bilimsel araştırmalarla sınırlı olmak kaydıyla kullanılmasına izin veriyorum/z/. İzin için ayrıca e-posta gönderilmesine gerek yoktur.

Makale

İNDİR

Ölçek Formu

İNDİR

Link: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/rumelide/article/1074140

Ölçek Çeşidi: Geliştirme

Kategori(ler):

30 Eğitim Bilimleri ve Öğretmen Yetiştirme » 320 Eğitim Programları » 325 Öğretim Yöntem ve Teknikleri » 385 Yabancı Dil Eğitimi

Kaynak Türü: Makale

Kaynak/Referans:

İpek, Ö. F. & Mutlu, H. T. (2022). Distance Education System Evaluation of English Language Teaching: A scale development study. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, (26), 978-994.

Geliştiren/Uyarlayan: Ömer Faruk İpek, Hakan Tahiri Mutlu

Yıl: 2022

Kaynak Adı: Distance education system evaluation of English language teaching: A scale development study

Dergi: RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi

Cilt: 26

Sayı: Evet

Sayfa Aralığı: 978-994

DOI: DOI: 10.29000/rumelide.1074140

Sorumlu Yazar: Ömer Faruk İPEK

İletişim: tahirimutlu@ibu.edu.tr

Ölçülen Özellikler: İngilizce Dersine Yönelik Dinleme ve Konuşma Başarısı, İngilizce Dil Becerileri Öz Yeterliği, İngilizce Öğrenimi

Alt Boyutlar: Değerlendirme, Dil Becerileri, İçerik Değerlendirme, İletişim, Öğretmen

Örnek Maddeler ve Madde Sayıları: 1. I can understand what I read in English in accordance with the current level.
2. I can speak English in accordance with the current level.
3. I can write in English in accordance with the current level.
4. I can understand what I listen in English in accordance with the current level.
5. I know the appropriate vocabulary for the current level.
6. I can pronounce English words appropriate to the current level.
7. I know the grammar rules appropriate to the current level.
8. I could easily reach the responsible people when I faced any problem.
9. I was able to communicate easily with the university during distance education.
10. I easily communicated with the department administration during distance education.
11. The problems I encountered in distance education were solved quickly and effectively by the responsible people.
12. Sufficient information was given about the Preparatory Education in distance education.
13. The documents on the website in distance education are sufficient.
14. Adequate information was given about extracurricular practices.
15. I am satisfied with the distance education system.
16. I easily adapted to distance education.
17. I think I can learn English through distance education.
18. I am satisfied with my learning and course performance in distance education.
19. I am satisfied with the application used for distance education (Teams, Zoom etc.).
20. The distance education system is suitable for active participation of students such as discussion, asking questions and group work.
21. I effectively used extracurricular applications.
22. I think that the English curriculum is prepared appropriately to distance education.
23. I can easily communicate with my instructors.
24. I can easily ask questions to my instructors during the lessons.
25. Courses in distance education are taught effectively and efficiently.
26. I am satisfied with the exam frequency.
27. In the exams, questions were asked about the subjects we studied.
28. In the exams, the difficulty level of the questions was appropriate.
29. The distribution of points and overall grade evaluation required for year-end pass-fail in distance education are fair and accurate.
30. I am satisfied with the use of different measurement tools (online exams, projects, writing assignments, etc.).

Kullanılan Araştırmalar
scholar.google.com.tr