Çok Boyutlu Örgütsel İnsandışılaştırma Ölçeği
Kullanım İzni
Geliştirdiğim(iz) / uyarladığım(ız) ölçme aracının atıf gösterilmesi ve bilimsel araştırmalarla sınırlı olmak kaydıyla kullanılmasına izin veriyorum/z/. Araştırmanının başlangıcında araştırmanın amacı ile bir bilginin sorumlu yazara e-posta gönderilmesi yeterlidir.
Link: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351254
Ölçek Çeşidi: Geliştirme
Kategori(ler):
10 Psikoloji » 190 Örgütsel/Endüstriyel Psikoloji
Kaynak Türü: Makale
Kaynak/Referans:
Kazazoglu, S., Sahin, D., Guzeller, C. O., Ilhan-Findikoglu, D., & Findikoglu, F. (2026). Development and validation of a Multidimensional Organizational Dehumanization Scale: Evidence from higher education. PLOS One, 21(7), Article e0351254. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0351254
Geliştiren/Uyarlayan: Semin Kazazoglu, Dilruba Şahin, Cem Oktay Güzeller, Dilek İlhan Fındıkoğlu, Fuat Fındıkoğlu
Yıl: 2026
Kaynak Adı: Development and validation of a multidimensional organizational dehumanization scale: Evidence from higher education
Dergi: Plos One
Cilt: 21
Sayı: 7
Sayfa Aralığı: e0351254
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0351254
Sorumlu Yazar: Semin Kazazoğlu
İletişim: seminkazazoglu@gmail.com
Ölçülen Özellikler: Örgütsel insandışılaştırma
Alt Boyutlar: Araçsallaştırma, Değersizleştirme
Ölçek Türü: Öz Bildirim
Kimlere Uygulanabilir: 18 yaş üstü çalışan yetişkinler, Akademisyenler
Derecelendirme: 5'li Likert
Geçerlik: Convergent validity
Convergent validity evidence was examined within the broader framework of validity evidence based on relationships among variables [51]. For this purpose, composite reliability (CR) and average variance extracted (AVE) values were calculated. In addition, standardized factor loadings, t values, and item reliability estimates were evaluated as indicators of the measurement quality of the items. Item reliability indicates the extent to which an item is consistent with the construct being measured. When a large proportion of an item’s variance is explained by the underlying construct, the measurement instrument can be considered reliable.
Standardized factor loadings and statistically significant t values were considered when evaluating item-level evidence for convergent validity [52,53]. The t values of all items were statistically significant. Although most standardized factor loadings were at or above the commonly used .50 level, two items had slightly lower loadings. In addition, item reliability values varied across items, indicating that convergent validity evidence should be interpreted together with CR and AVE rather than on the basis of item reliability alone.
Composite reliability reflects the internal consistency and reliability of the subdimensions within a measurement instrument and is considered one of the fundamental criteria for evaluating measurement models. A composite reliability value of .70 or higher is regarded as acceptable. In the present study, composite reliability values were high for both subdimensions, supporting the internal consistency of the two-factor measurement model [53,54].
The AVE value, another indicator of convergent validity, is expected to be .50 or higher [53,54]. While the Instrumentality subdimension met this criterion, the Devaluation subdimension yielded an AVE value below the recommended threshold. Therefore, convergent validity evidence was stronger for the Instrumentality subdimension than for the Devaluation subdimension.
Finally, the relationships between the two subdimensions of the Multidimensional Organizational Dehumanization Scale were found to be statistically significant at the .01 level, with moderate correlations observed between the subdimensions. This finding indicates that the two subdimensions are related but not redundant.
Discriminant validity
Discriminant validity assesses the extent to which a measurement instrument is able to distinguish between different constructs. In the present study, discriminant validity was evaluated using the criterion proposed by Fornell and Larcker [54]. According to this approach, the square of the correlation between two constructs is compared with the average variance extracted (AVE) values of each construct. Discriminant validity is considered to be established when the AVE values of both constructs are greater than the squared correlation between them. Based on the comparison between the calculated squared correlation and the AVE values, the results indicated that discriminant validity was achieved.
Güvenirlik: Reliability
The reliability of the scale was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient based on internal consistency. Cronbach’s alpha values were calculated for each factor and for the overall scale. The obtained coefficients ranged from .93 to .96.
Specifically, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was .93 for the first factor, .96 for the second factor, and .96 for the overall scale. These results indicate that the scale demonstrated high internal consistency reliability.
Kullanılan Araştırmalar
scholar.google.com.tr