Hemşire Kültürel Yeterlik Ölçeği
Kullanım İzni
Dizinde yer alan e-posta adresi TOAD ekibi tarafından açık kaynaklardan eklenmiştir. Dizinde sorumlu yazar e-postası yer almıyorsa veya dizinde yer alan e-postadan geri dönüş alamıyorsanız başka kaynaklardan diğer e-postalarına ulaşarak izin almanızı öneririz.
Ölçek Çeşidi
Uyarlama
Kaynak Türü
Makale
Kaynak/Referans
Gözüm, S., Tuzcu, A., & Kirca, N. (2016). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Nurse Cultural Competence Scale. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 27(5), 487-495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659615582089
Geliştiren/Uyarlayan
Ayla TUZCU, Nurcan Kırca, Sebahat Gözüm
Yıl
2016
Kaynak Adı
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Nurse Cultural Competence Scale
Dergi
Journal of Transcultural Nursing
Cilt
27
Sayı
5
Sayfa Aralığı
487–495
Link:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1043659615582089
Dosyalar
Makale
PDF
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659615582089
Sorumlu Yazar
Sebahat Gözüm
İletişim
sgozum@akdeniz.edu.tr
Ölçülen Özellikler
Cultural competence
Alt Boyutlar
cultural knowledge, cultural sensitivity, cultural skills
Örnek Maddeler ve Madde Sayıları
20 items
Kimlere Uygulanabilir
nurses
Derecelendirme
-
Ölçek Puanlaması
Twelve statements related to cultural skills, six statements related to cultural knowledge, and two statements related to cultural sensitivity are assessed with agreement levels of strongly disagree (1), disagree (2), not sure (3), agree (4), and strongly agree (5); scores vary between 20 and 100.
Ölçek Değerlendirmesi
5’li Likert
Geçerlik
Content Validity Index. The extent of agreement between the
expert team members was assessed by using a content validity index in the study. The members evaluated the feasibility
and relevance of each item in the scale by rating them from 1
(not relevant) to 4 (very relevant) as follows: 1 = not relevant; 2 = unable to assess relevance without item revision or
item is in need of such revision that it would no longer be relevant; 3 = relevant but needs minor alteration; 4 = very
relevant. The CVI of the scale was calculated by dividing the number of items rated 3 or 4 by the total number of items,
and the value greater than 80% was regarded as a standard for testing expert validity The CVI was 0.98 for the NCCS-T, which meant that the scales were feasible for further use
Güvenirlik
Internal Consistency and Item Analysis. The scales’ item means,
standard deviations, item–total correlations, and Cronbach
coefficients were determined. Cronbach’s correlation coefficient of the 20-item NCCS-T was found to be .96, and the
corrected item–total correlations of each item varied between
.66 and .81 (p < .05)
Stability. The stability of the NCCS-T was verified by fulfilling test–retest with a 2-week interval. The coefficient of the
NCCS-T was .90
Kullanılan Araştırmalar
scholar.google.com.tr
Orijinal Form
Orijinal Kaynak / Referans
Perng, S. J., & Watson, R. (2012). Construct validation of the nurse
cultural competence scale: A hierarchy of abilities. Journal
of Clinical Nursing, 21, 1678-1684.
Orijinal Ölçek DOI
10.1111/j.1365- 2702.2011.03933.x