Kullanım İzni
Dizinde yer alan e-posta adresi TOAD ekibi tarafından açık kaynaklardan eklenmiştir. Dizinde sorumlu yazar e-postası yer almıyorsa veya dizinde yer alan e-postadan geri dönüş alamıyorsanız başka kaynaklardan diğer e-postalarına ulaşarak izin almanızı öneririz.

---

---

Link: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1043659615582089

---

Ölçek Çeşidi: Uyarlama

---

Kaynak Türü: Makale

---

Kaynak/Referans:

Gözüm, S., Tuzcu, A., & Kirca, N. (2016). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Nurse Cultural Competence Scale. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 27(5), 487-495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659615582089

---

Geliştiren/Uyarlayan: Ayla TUZCU, Nurcan Kırca, Sebahat Gözüm

---

Yıl: 2016

---

Kaynak Adı: Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Nurse Cultural Competence Scale

---

Dergi: Journal of Transcultural Nursing

---

Cilt: 27

---

Sayı: 5

---

Sayfa Aralığı: 487–495

---

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659615582089

---

Sorumlu Yazar: Sebahat Gözüm

---

İletişim: sgozum@akdeniz.edu.tr

---

Ölçülen Özellikler: Cultural competence

---

Alt Boyutlar: cultural knowledge, cultural sensitivity, cultural skills

---

Örnek Maddeler ve Madde Sayıları:

20 items

---

Kimlere Uygulanabilir: nurses

---

Ölçek Puanlaması:

Twelve statements related to cultural skills, six statements related to cultural knowledge, and two statements related to cultural sensitivity are assessed with agreement levels of strongly disagree (1), disagree (2), not sure (3), agree (4), and strongly agree (5); scores vary between 20 and 100.

---

Ölçek Değerlendirmesi:

5’li Likert

---

Geçerlik:

Content Validity Index. The extent of agreement between the
expert team members was assessed by using a content validity index in the study. The members evaluated the feasibility
and relevance of each item in the scale by rating them from 1
(not relevant) to 4 (very relevant) as follows: 1 = not relevant; 2 = unable to assess relevance without item revision or
item is in need of such revision that it would no longer be relevant; 3 = relevant but needs minor alteration; 4 = very
relevant. The CVI of the scale was calculated by dividing the number of items rated 3 or 4 by the total number of items,
and the value greater than 80% was regarded as a standard for testing expert validity The CVI was 0.98 for the NCCS-T, which meant that the scales were feasible for further use

---

Güvenirlik:

Internal Consistency and Item Analysis. The scales’ item means,
standard deviations, item–total correlations, and Cronbach
coefficients were determined. Cronbach’s correlation coefficient of the 20-item NCCS-T was found to be .96, and the
corrected item–total correlations of each item varied between
.66 and .81 (p < .05)
Stability. The stability of the NCCS-T was verified by fulfilling test–retest with a 2-week interval. The coefficient of the
NCCS-T was .90

---

Kullanılan Araştırmalar
scholar.google.com.tr